Stresses
Dave,
One thing to point out is, as you stated, engine bolts are designed for tensile loading, not shear loading, and hydrofoils increase the shear loads on the bolts. I do not mean to imply that the additional stress would lead to premature failure of the engine bolts. In fact, I don't think there has ever been a case outside of a lab where a hydrofoil has been the sole or main factor in engine bolts failing.
That being said, I have seen several instances where the transom around the bolts has failed after being weakened due to some other factor, including rotting or poor engineering. In cases of transom failure, there is some anecdotal evidence to suggest that engine-mounted hydrofoils aggrevate such failures. I do not think this is a concern on the Triumph boats, if is my firm belief that the materials, engineering, and manufacture provide more than enough safety margin to allow for the safe use of a hydrofoil stabilizer.
The main point I was trying to make was, the purpose of trim tabs and hydrofoils is to lift the transom, and the most efficient way to do this is through lift devices mounted directly to the transom, not through devices mounted to the engine and transfering the lift through through the engine mount. Hydrofoils do add stresses to components that were not originally designed into them. Will those added stresses cause failure? Outside of extreme cases, probably not. But I am of the opinion that when trying to solve a problem, go for the most direct, simplest solution.
With the release of the SmartTabs by nauticus, I really see no need for the traditional hydrofoil stabilzer. They were intended as an economic alternative to traditional trim tabs for smaller boats, and the smart tabs now fill this role. When recommending lift/stabilzing devices, the question I ask my customers now is whether they want to control the tab positions while underway or not, and use that answer to decide smart tabs or tradtional tabs. Hope This Helps!